Morals and Responsibility III

Euthanasia falls into the same category as abortion. Once we have been desensitized to death of the unborn, we can start killing the very old. It is now called assisted suicide, but that is just for now and it is still killing. Once taking life by assisted suicide becomes common, it may no longer be the patient themselves who make the decision to terminate their life. Imagine if you will, once the world gets still more populated, people being chosen for death because of their age, some deformity, a costly medical problem or some other criteria. Criteria that someone else (probably government) lays down. "That could not happen in America", you say, "That would be murder". Think about what I have said about the abortion and what was said in the sixties and then think about it again. Terry Shivo may be the tip of the iceberg on that front. Here was a woman who was starved to death because her husband wanted her insurance money and wanted to be able to marry the woman he was living in sin with and having children with. He said he believed in "Until death do us part" so he hurried the death. Our fasciunist court system gave him all the help he needed. They even usurped the congress who are to appoint those very courts, the governer of the state and the state representatives. So stand by for more mercy killings, this is just the beginning. There is a lot more of this type of murder taking place, it is just that most of it never makes the news. Many environmentilists already feel that there are already too many humans on earth. As most of thes groups are pure fasciunist, (usually with communist backing) you can look for them to promote euthanasia. Many of them already are saying it is okay to kill humans to save animals, so it probably will not be long before they rationalize the death of all old people. This is just another type of "ethnic" cleansing with a different set of parameters. Another thing that the sexual revolution and the no fault, no responsibility mantra brought us is the homosexual/lesbian movement. This type of pervert has been around since the beginning of recorded history. However in the past these people have been considered to be sinners. This is not only true of christianity, but of all religions that I am aware of. In our bibles and other holy books, homosexuality/lesbianism are treated as an abomination before God. Now, by using amorality as their code, fasciunists have made homosexuals and lesbians almost seem superior to hetro-sexuals. You have to remember, it is not their fault, the are not responsible for the way they are, they were born that way. That is a lot of fasciunist lies. Tell a big enough lie often enough and soon the people will believe it. Well I do not believe it for a minute. These people choose the life they live. It may be harder for some to live a hetro-sexual life, but it is possible. Take the easy way out they are told, if it feels good do it, we will make it legal, give you benefits, special privelages, the faciunists tell them. All of this at the taxpayers expense and in contradiction to the wishes of the majority of the population. I believe one of the reasons the fasciunists back this type of lifestyle is for population control. Two people of the same gender cannot produce babies. That and the fact that fasciunists want total people control are enough for them to back anything that will help the to obtain their goal.